cat aging_ad_atlas.md

Single-Cell & Spatial Transcriptomics of Brain Aging & Alzheimer's

// Resolving cell-type– and region-specific molecular changes in memory-associated brain regions — // integrating single-cell RNA sequencing, Visium HD spatial transcriptomics, and ATAC-seq // in the 5xFAD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

An Integrated Transcriptomic Atlas of Neurodegeneration

// We pair full-transcriptome single-cell profiling with high-resolution spatial mapping to ask how aging and Alzheimer's pathology reshape the molecular landscape of the brain — one cell type and one region at a time.

// approach — Single-cell libraries are generated with Chromium X Fixed RNA Profiling and spatial libraries with Visium HD, which together enable full-transcriptome analysis at single-cell resolution and spatial mapping down to 2µm. Across these assays we resolve 34 single-cell and 41 spatial cell-type annotations, define genes that are differentially expressed in disease, and trace how those changes are distributed across memory-associated circuits and altered cell–cell signaling.
80k
single_cells
2.2M
spatial_cells
2µm
visium_hd_res
5xFAD
disease_model

Library Preparation Workflows

// Parallel single-cell and spatial pipelines, from probe hybridization to sequencing.

single_cell + spatial library prepfig01.png
Single-cell (Chromium X Fixed RNA Profiling) and spatial (Visium HD) transcriptomics library preparation workflows, from probe hybridization through GEM generation or slide adhesion, amplification, and library construction and sequencing.

// Figure 1 — Overview of single-cell (Chromium X Fixed RNA Profiling) and spatial (Visium HD) transcriptomics library preparation workflows. Both workflows enable full transcriptome analysis at single-cell resolution, with Visium HD spatial mapping reaching 2µm resolution.

Single-Cell Atlas & Differential Expression

// 80,000 cells resolved into 34 distinct cell types, with disease-driven changes in gene expression across the population.

UMAP — 34 cell typesfig02.png
UMAP projection of 80,000 cells colored by cell-type identity, resolving 34 distinct cell types from mouse brain tissue.

// Figure 2 — UMAP projection of 80,000 cells and 34 distinct cell-types from mouse brain tissue colored by cell type identity. Each point represents an individual cell and colors denote unique cell type annotations identified by scRNAseq.

volcano — DE genesfig03.png
Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes across cell types, each point a gene colored by cell-type annotation, with FDR and fold-change thresholds marked.

// Figure 3 — Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes across cell types identified using scRNAseq. Each point represents a unique gene colored by cell type annotation. Horizontal dotted line denotes FDR significance threshold and vertical dotted lines denote fold change cutoffs. Genes meeting both criteria are considered significantly up- or downregulated.

MA plot — AD vs WTfig04.png
MA plot of differential gene expression; orange dots are significantly upregulated genes, purple dots significantly downregulated, gray non-significant; x-axis average expression (logCPM), y-axis log2 fold change.

// Figure 4 — MA plot of differential gene expression. Purple dots represent downregulated genes and orange dots represent upregulated genes. The x-axis represents average gene expression (logCPM) and the y-axis represents log2 fold change (sample 1 vs sample 2). Non-significant genes are shown in gray.

cell-type compositionfig05.png
Stacked bar chart of cell-type composition across four samples; each bar subdivided by the proportional contribution of each of the 34 cell types.

// Figure 5 — Cell type composition across four samples. Each bar represents one sample and is subdivided by the proportional contribution of each cell type (y-axis, percent composition). Colors correspond to the 34 cell type annotations. Differences in composition across samples reflect variation in cellular abundance between conditions.

Spatial Transcriptomics — Visium HD

// ~2.2 million cells mapped in tissue at 2µm resolution, placing molecular change back into anatomical context.

spatial UMAP — group / genotype / age / cell typefig06.png
Four-panel UMAP projection of ~2.2 million cells from Visium HD spatial mapping, resolving 41 cell types, split by sample group, genotype, age, and cell type.

// Figure 6 — UMAP projection of ~2.2 million cells from mouse brain tissue using Visium HD spatial gene expression mapping (2µm resolution), resolving 41 distinct cell-types. UMAP panels are split by sample group, genotype, age, and cell-type to highlight compositional and transcriptional variation across experimental groups.

spatial expression — synaptic genesfig07.png
Spatial gene expression maps of a sagittal mouse brain section: total UMI counts, average scRNAseq-derived gene expression, and spatially resolved synaptic gene expression across memory-associated regions including hippocampus and thalamus.

// Figure 7 — Spatial gene expression map of the top differentially expressed genes identified by scRNAseq analysis. Panels show (left to right): total unique molecular identifier (UMI) counts, average scRNAseq-derived gene expression, and spatially resolved expression of synaptic genes across memory-associated brain regions in a sagittal mouse brain section.

transcript densityfig10.png
Transcript density map of a Visium HD tissue section; warm colors indicate higher transcript abundance, cooler colors lower expression.

// Figure 10 — Transcript density in a Visium HD tissue section. Warm colors indicate higher transcript abundance, whereas cooler colors indicate lower gene expression levels.

Pathways & Cell–Cell Communication

// From differentially expressed genes to enriched biological pathways and altered signaling between cell types.

GO enrichmentfig08.png
Dot plot of Gene Ontology analysis showing significantly enriched biological pathways across cell-type annotations.

// Figure 8 — Gene Ontology (GO) analysis showing significantly enriched biological pathways (y-axis) based on differentially expressed genes across cell-type annotations (x-axis).

cell–cell communicationfig09.png
Sankey plot depicting cell–cell communication between sender-cell ligands and receiver cell types, stratified by sample condition and direction of regulation.

// Figure 9 — Sankey plot depicting cell–cell communication between sender cell ligands and receiver cell types. Interactions are stratified by sample condition and indicate up- or down-regulated signaling prior to assignment of receiver cell identity.

Maycie Schultz, terminal phosphor portrait

Maycie Schultz

$ Biomedical Sciences Ph.D. Candidate · Project Lead

// Leads the lab's transcriptomic and epigenomic work on Alzheimer's disease progression — integrating single-cell RNA-seq, Visium HD spatial transcriptomics, and ATAC-seq in the 5xFAD model to find cell-type– and region-specific targets for therapeutic intervention.